|
Mendel's Hypothesis
One major difficulty with Darwin's theory of evolution by
natural selection was caused by the belief in
blending inheritance.
- traits of the parents are blended together to produce
progeny
- big crossed to little will produce intermediate
sized children, etc.
- Problem: if a new more fit variant appears in
a population they will have to mate with a normal
individual from the population and the progeny will be
less fit than the parent. (How likely is it that
Michael Jordan's children will be as good at basketball
as he is?)
- blending will produce a population where everyone
is average, i.e., mediocore
- A partial solution was to proprose that most
evolution occurs in small populations (on islands, for
instance) where the beneficial new traits wouldn't be
diluted as much
While Darwin wrestled with how to make his theory work
with blending inheritance, an obscure Austrian monk was
discovering that the inheritance of traits was much stranger
than everyone supposed.
Gregor Mendel
Gregor Mendel (1822-1884) was trained as a physicist and
brought a quantitative approach to the study of inheritance.
His studies were based on crosses between different strains
of peas grown at his monastary. He soon discovered that many
traits did not behave as would be expected from blending
inheritance. In a cross of white flowered peas with purple
flowered peas, for instance, the progeny would all have
purple flowers, not a light purple that would be expected
from blending. Even more bizarre was that crosses of the
hybrid blue flowered peas could produce white
progeny! With his physics background, Mendel decided to
cross large numbers of plants to see if there was a pattern.
Mendel's Experiment
- Mendel isolated true breeding strains of peas with
distinctive traits. In a true breeding strain crosses of
two individuals from the same strain (or of one plant
with itself) produce progeny who all have the trait. Thus
a cross of purple flowers with purple produce all purple
flowered progeny, white x white = all white, etc.
- Initially, he looked at only one trait at a time
(flower color, height, etc.)
- carefully controlled the breeding (used paintbrushes
to trnasfer pollen from one plant to another, etc.)
- kept careful records
- studied a large number of progeny
- followed the traits for several generations (he
crossed the progeny of each generation with one another)
- The first cross was between true breeding peas with
white flowers and true breeding peas with purple flowers
(the parentals)
- all progeny had purple flowers (the F1
generation)
- crosses of the F1 plants produced some
peas with purple flowers and some with white flowers
- out of 929 peas, 705 had purple flowers and 224
had white flowers (the F2)
- Mendel noted that this was a 3.15 to 1 ratio of
purple to white
- the white flowered F2 were true
breeding but only 1/3 of the purple F2 were
true breeding (the others produced a mixture of white
and purple progeny)
- Mendel repeated the experiment with six other traits,
in one case examining over 8,000 progeny
- in all cases, one trait dissappeared in the
F1 and then reappeared in the F2
in a ratio of 1 to three to the dominant trait
(the trait which disappears in the F1
Mendel called the recessive trait)
Mendel's Hypothesis
- Each trait is determined by pairs of discrete
physical units (now called genes)
- Pairs of genes separate from each other during gamete
formation (Law of Segregation)
- There may be two or more alternative forms of a gene
(alleles)
- Sometimes one allele (called the dominant
allele) can mask the expression of the other
(recessive) allele
- True-breeding organisms have two of the same alleles
(homozygotes), hybrids have two different alleles
(heterozygotes)
- Which member of a pair of genes becomes included in a
gamete is determined by chance (Law of
Independent Assortment)
Implications
- Solved Darwin's problem - an allele may blend with
another allele to produce an intermediate
phenotype but the allele is not lost or blended
- The phenotype (the observed characteristics of
an organism) is produced by the interaction of a
genotype (the collection of all pairs of genes in
the organism) with the environment
- a one way street - genotype produces phenotype but
phenotype does not produce the genotype (no
Lamarkism)
Punnett Square
An easy way to visualize what happens in a Mendelian
cross is to use a Punnett square
- Each individual has two versions of a gene (the two
alleles) so we use a symbol to stand for each allele
- Mendel used a single letter from the phenotype, a
capital letter stood for the dominant allele, a small
letter for the recessive allele
- In the purple white cross the gene is named purple
so the dominant allele that produces the purple
flowers would be P while the recessive allele
would be p
- a homozygous plant with the purple phenotype
would have a genotype of PP
- a homozygous plant with the white phenotype
would have a genotype of pp
- a heterozygous plant with the purple phenotype
would have a genotype of Pp (or pP)
- a cross can be represented by x so PP x pp is a
cross between purple and white true breeding peas
- In the Punnett square the alleles are separated from
one another (Law of Segragation) and put on one side the
square (usually one individuals allels go on the top and
the others go on the left side) the possible progeny are
then produced by filling the squares with one alle from
the top and one from the left to produce the progeny
genotypes
- PP x pp would look like this
- And Pp x Pp
- Note that if you count the squares for the progeny in
the second cross one out of four has the genotype PP, two
out of four have Pp and one out of the four is pp. As the
peas with either PP or Pp will have the same phenotype,
purple flowers, this produces a ratio of 3/4 purple
flowers to 1/4 white, the same as what Mendel observed.
- Another cross, that Mendel used to determine the
genotype of a hybrid plant, was the test cross. In
a test cross you cross the plant of unknown genotpe with
a homozygous recessive plant. There are two possiblities,
the unknown will either be homozygous for the dominant
allele
In which case all of the progeny will have purple
flowers, or the unknown is heterozygous and
one half of the progeny will have purple flowers and
one half will have white flowers.
For some practice with Punnet squares you can try the
Punnet
square application at the University of Cincinnati or
work through some
crosses
with peas at the same site (the crosses are pretty basic
so I would only recommend this if the Virtual Fly is too
confusing for you).
Independent Assortment
After his initial experiments with individual traits,
Mendel tried crosses with two traits at the same time, for
instance, true breeding round and yellow peas crossed with
true breeding wrinkled and green peas
As the F1 progeny all had round yellow peas round and
yellow are both dominant, the cross was
RRYY x rryy to give all RrYy
progeny
Crossing the F1 gave the following odd result
RrYy x RrYy
Results:
|
Observed
|
round, yellow
|
315
|
wrinkled, yellow
|
101
|
round, green
|
108
|
wrinkled, green
|
32
|
Total
|
556
|
If you examine the numbers, as Mendel did, you will
notice that 416/556 of the plants had yellow peas, versus
140/556 with green peas. 423/556 had round peas and 133/556
had wrinkled peas. thus both show the normal 3:1 ratio that
Mendel had observed when he studied the traits
independently. Why 315/556 for round and yellow then? A
ratio of .57? Where did that come from? Mendel reasoned that
if 3/4 of the F2 had round peas and if 3/4 had yellow peas
then if the traits were determined independently 3/4
x 3/4 = 9/16 (.5625) of the progeny should have both round
and yellow peas. In a like manner 3/4 x 1/4 = 3/16 should
have round and green peas, 1/4 x/ 3/4 = 3/16 should have
wrinkled and yellow peas and 1/4 x 1/4 = 1/16 should have
wrinkled and green peas. this can also be seen by counting
up the squares in the punnet square, which will have 16
squares, as there are four possible combinations of alleles
for each gamete
|
RY
|
Ry
|
rY
|
ry
|
RY
|
RRYY
|
RRYy
|
RrYY
|
RrYy
|
Ry
|
RRyY
|
RRyy
|
RryY
|
Rryy
|
rY
|
rRYY
|
rRYy
|
rrYY
|
rrYy
|
ry
|
rRyY
|
rRyy
|
rryY
|
rryy
|
Mendel concluded that
- Which member of a pair of genes becomes included in a
gamete is determined by chance (Law of
Independent Assortment)
This result implied that the different genes were
separate from each other (there is no connection between
them, the round allele was not tied to the wrinkled allele
in the F1 parents, for instance). While, as we
will see later, this is not always true, the concept of
genes as physical stuctures that were divided up
independently of one another was important and is true for
most genes.
Unfortunately, Mendel's results were ignored for over
thirty years. Perhaps the biggest reason (other than the
unfashionable use of mathmematics and probability in a
biology paper!) was there there was no structure known in
the cell that behaved in the odd manner that Mendel
predicted for his genes. Whatever the genes were they would
have to exist in pairs only and they would have to somehow
separate during gamete formation to produce a new pair when
two gametes fused to produce an embryo. In the ensuing
thirty years a structure was discovered in the cell that
behaved exactly as Mendel predicted for his genes. The
structures were called chromosomes. In the next
section we will look at how a special form of cell
reproduction called meiosis separates the chromosomes
just as Mendel had predicted for his alleles.
The following links contain additional information about
Mendel and his work.
Bell
CSU Chico
Library
This document is copyright of
Jeff
Bell
Last Update: Wednesday, August 12, 1998
|